SAP C_THR81_2605 Exam Overview:

SAP C_THR81_2605 Exam Syllabus Topics:

SAP Certified - SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core and Position Management (C_THR81_2605) Sample Questions:

1. <strong>CHALLENGE 3 &#x2014; Regional Manager Access for Claims Boundaries</strong> The project team has two access options: maintain strict regional boundaries and leave several valid manager test cases blocked, or grant broad regional visibility and complete all test cases quickly. Which option best supports the SIT objective?
Response:

A) Move access validation to a later phase and let HR operations complete all manager-facing test cases.
B) Grant broad visibility for all regional managers because complete test execution is more important than access evidence.
C) Maintain strict boundaries without adjustment because blocked access always confirms secure design.
D) Adjust roles and target populations to support assigned manager responsibilities, then retest blocked and out-of-scope records.

2. <strong>CHALLENGE 4 &#x2014; Position Change Routing for Regional Review</strong> A standard claims position change routes to the expected regional claims manager, but a comparable underwriting support position change remains with HR operations. The same regional manager can approve other employee updates in the assigned claims region.
What should be validated before changing workflow routing?
Response:

A) Whether every regional claims manager should be added to all position-change workflows during SIT.
B) Whether the underwriting employee context, position assignment, and regional responsibility support reviewer determination for the affected change.
C) Whether the workflow notification text tells users that underwriting requests may remain with HR operations.
D) Whether HR operations can approve all position changes centrally until policy renewal staffing scenarios are added.

3. In a public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core and Position Management project, a consultant is validating a workflow for position-linked temporary transfers. In the web-based environment, requests created for one business area start correctly but route to a fallback reviewer instead of the intended delegated approver when the primary approver is unavailable.
The same delegation behavior works for other business areas. The customer confirms that delegated approvers were maintained centrally and wants the routing fixed without duplicating workflows by business area, because long-term maintenance must stay simple. The issue began after the affected business area was added to the transfer design during the latest configuration cycle.
What should the consultant investigate first?
Response:

A) Instruct users in the affected business area to wait until the primary approver returns rather than using delegated routing.
B) Create a separate workflow for the affected business area so the delegated approver can be assigned directly without shared logic.
C) Review the rule or approver-determination condition for the newly added business area, then correct the logic that should resolve the delegated approver instead of the fallback reviewer.
D) Add the delegated approver to the fallback reviewer group so routed requests still reach someone who can approve them.

4. <strong>CHALLENGE 3 &#x2014; Compliance Manager Access for Legal Entity Boundaries</strong> Compliance operations managers request temporary access to all branch and insurance division positions so they can clear pending remediation cases. The HR governance owner wants legal entity boundaries to remain visible during testing.
Which configuration approach best handles this governance-versus-governance prioritization?
Response:

A) Validate assigned-scope access and target populations with representative compliance managers before considering any limited exception.
B) Grant cross-entity access temporarily and rely on post-remediation review to identify inappropriate visibility.
C) Restrict compliance managers from all insurance positions until branch testing is fully complete.
D) Keep current access unchanged and classify all blocked cases as proof that legal entity boundaries are working.

5. <strong>CHALLENGE 2 &#x2014; Position Context for Engineering Center Assignments</strong> An engineering transfer can be saved, but the manager-facing review later displays inconsistent plant context. The operations director asks whether the team can proceed if corporate HR verifies engineering transfers offline.
Which response best reflects the performance-versus-governance trade-off?
Response:

A) Narrow the hypercare validation set and verify representative engineering transfers in the system before relying on offline confirmation.
B) Stop all production and engineering transfers until every position record across the company is rebuilt.
C) Proceed with offline HR verification because it preserves active transfer processing and the transfer record saves successfully.
D) Open all engineering positions to plant managers temporarily so they can confirm transfers faster during hypercare.

Solutions: